Title |
Effect of Empagliflozin on Kidney Biochemical and Imaging Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, or Prediabetes, and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (SUGAR-DM-HF)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.122.059851 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew M.Y. Lee, Keith A. Gillis, Katriona J.M. Brooksbank, Sarah Allwood-Spiers, Pauline Hall Barrientos, Kirsty Wetherall, Giles Roditi, Bashair AlHummiany, Colin Berry, Ross T. Campbell, Victor Chong, Liz Coyle, Kieran F. Docherty, John G. Dreisbach, Bernd Kuehn, Catherine Labinjoh, Ninian N. Lang, Vera Lennie, Kenneth Mangion, Alex McConnachie, Clare L. Murphy, Colin J. Petrie, John R. Petrie, Kanishka Sharma, Steven Sourbron, Iain A. Speirits, Joyce Thompson, Paul Welsh, Rosemary Woodward, Ann Wright, Aleksandra Radjenovic, John J.V. McMurray, Pardeep S. Jhund, Mark C. Petrie, Naveed Sattar, Patrick B. Mark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 41% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Libya | 1 | 3% |
Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 31% |
Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,835,624
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,137
of 21,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,819
of 433,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#75
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.