RT @purviparwani: A randomized controlled trial published in 2015 failed to demonstrate a benefit of SoMe promotion on 30 days views and do…
RT @purviparwani: A randomized controlled trial published in 2015 failed to demonstrate a benefit of SoMe promotion on 30 days views and do…
A randomized controlled trial published in 2015 failed to demonstrate a benefit of SoMe promotion on 30 days views and downloads of papers https://t.co/HNL1pXPDZ5 Link to our Paper: https://t.co/tpxOGwM0IF https://t.co/wJXAsTmj4g
@hhburris @KentWillisMD @nuzzel I haven’t read full paper but yes, am surprised w/ effect magnitude. Growing literature on topic. Recent similar study agrees but smaller effect: https://t.co/ISchlOtW4H; prior similar design but w/page views as outcome conc
@ayako700 Mayo proceedingの差が激しすぎると思いました。 介入群はCirculationのViewをはるかに超える量ですからね すごい興味深い。本当か!って思ってしまいます 普段見られないJournalの方がSNSの影響力が大きいのか?って気がしますが、Mayoの方が対象Populationが大きいのかも https://t.co/UzfNHGbib4
@cshperspectives Other controlled trials in social media promotion of sci papers show similar small/null effects: https://t.co/CqCRQvO7q4 https://t.co/qgG3DsSDdR https://t.co/Xmt34ATpvJ https://t.co/CvCuJY43hX https://t.co/1SpOq0LT28
@VinayPrasadMD @venkmurthy @JACCJournals @DrMarthaGulati @bnallamo @ericjvelazquez @ZainabASamad @onco_cardiology @RogueRad @SVRaoMD @ProfDFrancis @ProfHayward It was an older circulation paper. We all agree social media is way powerful in 2018 than in 201
@hswapnil @VinayPrasadMD @venkmurthy @JACCJournals @DrMarthaGulati @bnallamo @ericjvelazquez @ZainabASamad @onco_cardiology @RogueRad @SVRaoMD @ProfDFrancis @ProfHayward @JeremySussman @CircAHA @AJKDonline Might be thinking of the Circ paper done by the ed
@VinayPrasadMD @venkmurthy @JACCJournals @DrMarthaGulati @bnallamo @ericjvelazquez @ZainabASamad @onco_cardiology @RogueRad @SVRaoMD @ProfDFrancis @ProfHayward @JeremySussman That was @CircAHA https://t.co/dDJhqTPyJQ Agree, journals have to engage more tha
RT @Damian_Roland: @NikkiAbela @JamieVassallo @richardbody Finally found the negative paper on this https://t.co/mdLbhJuPT7 I explain below…
@NikkiAbela @JamieVassallo @richardbody Finally found the negative paper on this https://t.co/mdLbhJuPT7 I explain below (badly) that just plumping out tweets doesn’t probably help as lots of people may read anyway or will never read… https://t.co/Bpi9tfkr
'A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation' https://t.co/Zz402J3oYB
A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation https://t.co/u8pXtYa46B
66 freaky ways Fox et al. is using social media research to live-tweet a nap! #edchat https://t.co/ot9in9oYS1
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! https://t.co/7O7yNR4GEb RE https://t.co/LKp1Jn1nU0
A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/LKp1Jn1nU0
RT @DrChrisMcAloon: @Jeddacath @pascalmeier74 IMO powerful tool (use both), but recent article challenges this perceived power https://t.co…
@Jeddacath @pascalmeier74 IMO powerful tool (use both), but recent article challenges this perceived power https://t.co/wlXopjLMgG #EuroPCR
A #Randomized Trial of #SocialMedia~exposure to #original articles improves article #impact metrics https://t.co/1qxZIcB6EH #Cardiovascular
.@tpklassen Here was the paper: https://t.co/LK9W87hOd1
RT @mtmdphd: A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
RT @mtmdphd: A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
@doctordiscodave @karlnorrington @EilidhPinkChic @MedCrisis @woollymammoth @Dr_Adds helped if I copied the link ➡️ https://t.co/7y8ZYBx5sP
RT @mtmdphd: A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
RT @mtmdphd: A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
RT @mtmdphd: A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
RT @mtmdphd: MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article https://t.co/P6sO2jgRao RE: https://t…
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article https://t.co/P6sO2jgRao RE: https://t.co/Wbi81Ek6aC
A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA https://t.co/7zQqJjKC2k
RT @TanyaLibrarian: Interesting conclusion: social media use doesn't increase articles views http://t.co/RdzWShUYvG #scholarlycommunications
RT @mtmdphd: MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/0X5CfiTXUX RE: http://t.…
RT @mtmdphd: MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/0X5CfiTXUX RE: http://t.…
RT @mtmdphd: MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/0X5CfiTXUX RE: http://t.…
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/0X5CfiTXUX RE: http://t.co/dXMXaXfYaO
Thx to @drjohnjryan for joining us today to talk about his @CircAHA article @mlrethlefsen http://t.co/CARhjpSFK5 https://t.co/16evnTZn7T
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/tLCMxHfQkG RE: http://t.co/RB8HZQRscV
Social media fails to increase views - negative "intention to tweet" trial? That's a Twitter pill to swallow. #FOAMed http://t.co/BSMAVm93sW
A social media strategy for a CV journal did not increase the number of times an article was viewed. RCT results http://t.co/zh9YrezlSb
Circulation'dan tarihinin en boş çalışması. Mantık: Bakmak=Görmek=Öğrenmek . Bu mantıkla yazıyı spamlemem hata olmaz http://t.co/EoCI5oFDl6
Interesting negative social media pub exposure trial @cmaer & @ARJalali. http://t.co/40M128FfZK v @CircAHA. #ccpl15 #hcsmca #hcsm
Interesting negative social media pub exposure trial @cmaer & @ARJalali. http://t.co/40M128FfZK v @CircAHA. #ccpl15 #hcsmca #hcsm
TYVM! “@cmaer: Reference for RCT looking at using social media for promoting journal articles http://t.co/ZlyjAY1vp1 @ARJalali #ccpl15”
Reference for RCT looking at using social media for promoting journal articles http://t.co/MBsPhXRB1l @ARJalali #ccpl15
Great study on whether social media exposure increases views of original articles @Stackly_org #HighWire2015 http://t.co/Oq9rNbdH4O
Great study on whether social media exposure increases views of original articles @Stackly_org #HighWire2015 http://t.co/Oq9rNbdH4O
Great study on whether social media exposure increases views of original articles @Stackly_org #HighWire2015 http://t.co/Oq9rNbdH4O
Social media strategy for Circulation did not increase article downloads. Note study limitations. http://t.co/tiXxPj4jsk
Here's the @CircAHA article @MDaware just mentioned: http://t.co/8TSvhHo1sp
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
Letters to the Editor re @CircAHA's NNTweet study are up! http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI cc @DrAndrewDixon @MDaware @cabreraERDR
A randomized trial of social media from Circulation. http://t.co/1AL5P7g7vE
A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA http://t.co/loIUZBAXal
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/7O7yNR4GEb RE: http://t.co/Lz3LMTgUbm
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/7O7yNR4GEb RE: http://t.co/Lz3LMTgUbm
MT @JohnNosta: Dr. Assad gets it! Social Media DOES Impact Views of a Scientific Article! http://t.co/7O7yNR4GEb RE: http://t.co/Lz3LMTgUbm
A Randomized Trial of Social Media from Circulation [11/18/14] - Fox et al. @CircAHA http://t.co/loIUZBAXal
"@CircAHA: publicar un articulo en redes sociales no aumenta las visitas al mismo. http://t.co/8gIhJ9aQkS #SoMe http://t.co/fMUkZwxZoN"
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
No difference viewing articles via social media or not. http://t.co/hSQQxAycQ5
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
Our letter to the editor to @CircAHA re the 'intention to tweet' trial (http://t.co/DkzyAFCEjI) was accepted! cc @cabreraERDR & @MDaware
Дещо інше дослідження на тему щодо попередньої публікації http://t.co/1oecOVDGN7 http://t.co/aN8rLI8oNz
RCT on social media effect on page views of journal papers found no effect 30 days later. http://t.co/jOFtmSvOmp (though pub on 6 Jan..)
@richardkeijzer @ericbenchimol Did you guys see this http://t.co/hA16va2ufF an RCT of social media to promote science:http://t.co/516ngxu8e6
Not sure this particular #SoMe intervention would produce results (need to do more than just release tweets..) http://t.co/UGY3IMNCoX [1/3]
Not sure this particular #SoMe intervention would produce results (need to do more than just release tweets..) http://t.co/UGY3IMNCoX [1/3]
Comment on Fox CS (2015): A randomized trial of social media from circulation. http://t.co/htSH3vWeSD
Interesting conclusion: social media use doesn't increase articles views http://t.co/RdzWShUYvG #scholarlycommunications
Interesting conclusion: social media use doesn't increase articles views http://t.co/RdzWShUYvG #scholarlycommunications
Does social media increase the number of times an article is viewed? http://t.co/Qttnu98JuX #nhssm
Fox CS et al trial of social media from circulation. Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):28-33. http://t.co/CFAeD9WkVu
Does social media publicity affect page views of a journal article? Read this #RCT in #Circulation http://t.co/gH8fWQaBTz
Sharing on social media does not impact article downloads - RCT in Circulation http://t.co/E20fKJQBkb
Using social media to publicise journal articles - http://t.co/9rqehVzgv0
only good science can boost its impact http://t.co/nCeMFvQm19
“@xgmoll: 'intention to tweet' http://t.co/5gxTKwwi14” Que bueno, evidencia científica para probar la eficacia de social media!! 👍
Por fin ha salido el artículo 'intention to tweet' http://t.co/gyEbifgNro
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/dhEnQ89pxN
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/dhEnQ89pxN
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/dhEnQ89pxN
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/dhEnQ89pxN
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/zn7ub889os
Many flaws. #SoMe for #medical #research didn't work. Is there a better strategy? http://t.co/kHMDDrWluW @CircAHA @Christianassad #MedEd
ICYMI: Intention-to-Tweet trial now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/zn7ub889os
RCT - #socialmedia strategy for a #cardiovasculardisease journal didnt increase number of times an article was viewed http://t.co/rfhjdBfVXW
The Intention-to-Tweet trial has now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/6aXAgzPqkL
The Intention-to-Tweet trial has now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/6aXAgzPqkL
Tweets don't result in more downloads "@CircAHA: The Intention-to-Tweet trial http://t.co/joQqhe4BgN #SoMe http://t.co/sxDpOpkrm5”
The Intention-to-Tweet trial has now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/6aXAgzPqkL
Tweets don't result in more downloads "@CircAHA: The Intention-to-Tweet trial http://t.co/joQqhe4BgN #SoMe http://t.co/sxDpOpkrm5”
The Intention-to-Tweet trial has now published! What do you think about our findings? http://t.co/SJJrDf07Ea #SoMe http://t.co/6aXAgzPqkL