| Title |
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.109.859280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Dewey, Elke Zimmermann, Florian Deissenrieder, Michael Laule, Hans-Peter Dübel, Peter Schlattmann, Fabian Knebel, Wolfgang Rutsch, Bernd Hamm |
| Abstract |
Noninvasive coronary angiography with the use of multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value; however, the radiation exposure associated with this technique is rather high. We evaluated coronary angiography using whole-heart 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 62% |
| Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,926,847
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,287
of 19,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,035
of 93,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#18
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.