↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy
Published in
Circulation, September 2009
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.109.859280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Dewey, Elke Zimmermann, Florian Deissenrieder, Michael Laule, Hans-Peter Dübel, Peter Schlattmann, Fabian Knebel, Wolfgang Rutsch, Bernd Hamm

Abstract

Noninvasive coronary angiography with the use of multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value; however, the radiation exposure associated with this technique is rather high. We evaluated coronary angiography using whole-heart 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Other 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 67%
Engineering 10 11%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 7 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,267,068
of 16,463,061 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,852
of 17,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,592
of 75,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#27
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,463,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.